ABOUT US

1EdTech is the leading member-led non-profit edtech partnership accelerating the digital transformation of learning

The 1EdTech community is guided by a set of educational leadership strategies essential to improving learning experiences and outcomes in K-12, higher education, and lifelong learning

1EdTech community-led workstreams help create a secure, scalable, and best-in-class digital learning ecosystem to serve the needs of all learners

1EdTech standards support seamless interoperability, lower TCO, and greater choice.

The TrustEd Apps Directory is the official listing of products and applications reviewed, vetted, or certified by 1EdTech

1EdTech hosts the annual Learning Impact Conference and other engagement opportunities throughout the year to advance the leadership and ideas that shape the future of digital learning

TrustEd Apps Profile for STEMscopes

Product: STEMscopes
Vetted by Frankey Goss, Director of Information Security & Data Privacy at Accelerate Learning on 2025-05-09

Accessibility Rubric Results: Optimized

Rubric Area Expectations
General Optimized Advancing Emerging
GEN1 - How are changes to key policies managed?
ANSWER: Notification is provided to the user in advance and a history of policy revisions are available
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
Information and Documentation Optimized Advancing Emerging
User Notes D1 - Does the supplier have a publicly available statement regarding accessibility?
ANSWER: General statement of accessibility conformance. May identify a standard followed by the company. May or may not include accessibility conformance documentation or contact information to obtain additional information.
User Notes:
Accessibility Statement identifies WCAG 2.1 AA standard and will be updated in the coming weeks to reflect WCAG 2.2 AA as we are currently working with a third-party accessibility auditor to confirm compliance.
Accessibility Statement identifies WCAG 2.1 AA standard and will be updated in the coming weeks to reflect WCAG 2.2 AA as we are currently working with a third-party accessibility auditor to confirm compliance.
Unselected Option: Answer Partially Meets Expectations Unselected Option:
D2 - Does the supplier provide accessibility conformance documentation?
ANSWER: Accessibility conformance report (a completed VPAT) has comprehensive detail about how the criteria are met. May also provide information about alternative access options if needed.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
D3 - Are the documents shared by the supplier accessible?
ANSWER: Fully accessible documents.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
D4 - How long ago was the accessibility conformance documentation completed and/or updated?
ANSWER: Less than 12 months prior to the completion date of the rubric.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
User Notes D5 - Does the supplier have a documented roadmap for accessibility improvements and enhancements?
ANSWER: Minimal information about planned accessibility improvements and enhancements.
User Notes:
Internally we have detailed documentation but externally facing documentation is minimal.
Internally we have detailed documentation but externally facing documentation is minimal.
Unselected Option: Answer Partially Meets Expectations Unselected Option:
Procurement Process and Communication Optimized Advancing Emerging
P1 - Does the supplier provide a demonstration of accessibility (features) as part of the sales process?
ANSWER: Accessibility features are discussed or demonstrated at a high level; broad overview without significant detail about conformance testing and compatibility with commonly used assistive technology.
 Unselected Option: Answer Partially Meets Expectations Unselected Option:
P2 - How are accessibility gaps identified?
ANSWER: There is a comprehensive strategy employed by the supplier to include qualified accessibility professionals, native users of assistive technology, third party accessibility consultants and others to reflect a variety of experiences.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
P3 - How does the supplier communicate known accessibility gaps to the customer?
ANSWER: Information will be provided upon request.
 Unselected Option: Answer Partially Meets Expectations Unselected Option:
P4 - Does the supplier have a process for customers to report accessibility specific concerns and issues?
ANSWER: Supplier provides a dedicated accessibility related customer and/or technical support mechanism. Timelines for responses by the accessibility related support are provided.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
Accessibility Conformance Optimized Advancing Emerging
C01 - How has accessibility been included in the design of the product?
ANSWER: Accessibility was integrated into all stages of the design and development, including consultation with native assistive technology users.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
C02 - Does the product claim conformance with one or more industry standards?
ANSWER: Conforms to international standards at customary minimal thresholds (e.g., A specification of W3C Accessibility Guidelines).
 Unselected Option: Answer Partially Meets Expectations Unselected Option:
C03 - Does the supplier integrate accessibility testing into the product management process, including manual and automated testing?
ANSWER: Full accessibility evaluations, including automatic and manual assessments, are conducted.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
C04 - Does the supplier ensure that subcontractors conform to the same accessibility standards of the supplier?
ANSWER: Subcontractor work is evaluated and vetted at regular intervals to ensure accuracy of work product.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
C05 - Does the supplier provide training to team members regarding accessibility?
ANSWER: Role-based training is provided on a regular, continuing basis.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
C06 - Were native or full-time assistive technology users included in the evaluation of the product?
ANSWER: Intentional efforts to have native/FT assistive technology users integrated into the evaluation and QA strategy and processes.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
C07 - Were evaluations of the product consistent with the information provided by the supplier?
ANSWER: Consistent findings with supplier provided information but may include some minor accessibility issues.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
C08 - What follow-up occurred after accessibility issues were discovered?
ANSWER: Proactive communication about the issues, plans and projected timelines to address them.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
C09 - Did the supplier seek client input on prioritization of accessibility improvements?
ANSWER: Input was sought prior to development of remediation plans.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
C10 - How has the supplier remediated accessibility issues as it works with the clients?
ANSWER: There have been multiple or high priority accessibility improvements to the product over the past 12 months, including regular and/or ongoing communication with clients.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:
Alternatives and Accommodations Optimized Advancing Emerging
A1 - Does the product allow for individual personalization of the interface and other capabilities (user preferences)?
ANSWER: Some personalization is possible but limited.
 Unselected Option: Answer Partially Meets Expectations Unselected Option:
A2 - Does the supplier provide guidance or suggestions for alternatives or workarounds to address accessibility gaps?
ANSWER: Supplier has suggestions based on accessibility needs and engages with the client to discuss those needs and develop alternatives.
 Answer Meets Expectations Unselected Option: Unselected Option:

Vetting Context

Policies Cited

The following urls were cited as a basis for this information.

Geographical Context

(Laws and regulations can vary across regions)

The views and opinions expressed in this information are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of 1EdTech. The information provided is intended to surface trends about the policies and procedures of systems leveraged by the educational community. It should not be considered legal advice.

Disclaimer: The 1EdTech TrustEd Apps Accessibility Rubric provides a self-assessment tool for a supplier to evaluate their product’s posture toward accessibility, according to the 1EdTech TrustEd Apps Accessibility Rubric Specification v1.0. This information is to provide additional context on accessibility, beyond conformance and legislative requirements. Find out more here.

© Copyright 2025 1EdTech Global Learning Consortium Inc. All Rights Reserved.

App Vetting Rubric Version: 2